Maori
Politics
by Ross N Himona
(An article written
for “The Republican”, 1993)
In one of my madder moods I went to a
National Party hui at a
One of the most interesting things I
learned was that at that time the Maori Committee of the Wellington Division of
the National Party consisted mainly of Pakeha delegates. Another was that Party
officials could not understand why a retired commissioned Army officer did not
support the National Party. It seems that most other retired Maori officers do.
Nor could they understand how I could be so politically active without actually
belonging to or supporting any political party.
In exasperation one of them finally
asked me to explain my politics, and I answered quite simply and clearly that
Ngati Kahungunu was my politics. As I belonged to an
iwi I had no need of a political party.
At that stage the eyes glazed over.
That reaction sums up the attitude of
the average politician for whom the only politics are that variety practised in the Parliament, and by the political parties
which between them depend on Parliament to exercise power and control over the
rest of us. Despite our four token Maori seats in Parliament that particular
variety of politics has haphazardly grown to totally exclude Maori politics.
Maori politics are not an appendage of
the Parliamentary system, or a brown imitation of it. Maori politics are practised with great gusto, much noise, good humour, and sometimes too with considerable acrimony, just
like the other variety, up and down the country every day, on almost every marae. Maori politics are also practised
by the wise and respected, exerting quiet influence over the more visible noise
makers, just like the other variety.
Maori politics are practised
by the not-so-wise, by the manipulators, numbers men and power brokers, behind
doors and in dark corners; just like the other variety. Maori politics are very
effectively practised by our womenfolk quietly
getting on with the real business while the men prance and bluster; just like
the other variety.
Yet we in the tribal homelands have no
need of political parties. For the iwi or tribe is essentially a political
structure.
Generally speaking, in Te Ao Maori (The Maori World) the whanau
or extended family is a social unit and a small economic unit. The hapu or tribe
is, or was, the main economic unit which controlled the major economic resources
such as land and fisheries, and owned large capital assets such as whare whakairo (carved houses) or
waka taua (war canoes). The
hapu is also a political unit. In quite small iwi or tribes, these would be the
functions of the iwi.
The larger iwi, some very large
indeed, on the rare occasions when they function as cohesive units, were and
are little more than political units. Though they are still based on kinship
they can be quite diverse, and can have many different lines of descent not all
shared by all members. They can cover large regions, and in the past many of
them came together only when necessary; for instance, to ward off invaders from
outside the tribal lands. In these modern times there has developed an idealistic
and somewhat romantic notion of what an iwi was and is.
This version of an iwi has been
devised mostly by Maori public servants living in the diaspora,
mostly in
To give them their due, they have also
constructed this version of an iwi in order to reduce the number of Maori
organisations they and their political masters have to deal with. Throughout the
Sealord fiasco Doug Kidd and Doug Graham have made it
quite clear that they don't want to have to deal with a myriad of hapu.
They are instead dealing with the
bureaucratically reconstructed version of "iwi". Yet the economic
resources are the property of hapu, not iwi, and certainly not the property of
the reconstructed iwi.
The Parliamentary politicians and
bureaucrats are of course aided and abetted by the beneficiaries of this
reconstruction programme, who are those Maori businessmen politicians who directly
control the new "iwi" in their various forms. What we are seeing from
them is the creation of the "iwi" as a business centre
and economic unit, as well as a political power base. They are far removed from
the people in the hapu and whanau who used to
comprise the iwi.
What they are doing is building a
Maori political and business structure which bears no real relationship to the
traditional structures. It is designed to assimilate itself into the power structure
for the benefit of its political and business practitioners. It is not an iwi
although it often bears the name of an iwi. In at least two cases that I am
aware of the Government perceived versions of the iwi don't even bother to pretend
that they are the real iwi.
This is a far more sophisticated
attempt to gain political and conomic power than the Mana Motuhake Party which is
little more than a brown copy of the other political parties. It is not based on
Maori political structures, and certainly Matiu Rata has been vocally opposed
to the use of traditional structures, or their imitations, as vehicles for
political power. The Mana Motuhake
Party is of course now part of the
Behind all these machinations is the
attempt, one way or another, to integrate Maori people into the Parliament centred political system, so that they may benefit from the
system equally with non-Maori.
From my point of view the real
political challenge facing Aotearoa/New Zealand is how to make the real Maori
political process part of the political mainstream. We shouldn't have to form
imitation parties like Mana Motuhake,
and it is an affront to many Maori that there is now a proliferation of
imitation iwi recognised by Governments.
This challenge to properly represent Maori by coming alongside the Maori political process is one in which National and Labour are not even remotely interested. By going with Mana Motuhake the Alliance has passed it up.