Fiji Coup Supplement


The Truth
Ministry of Information, Suva)
28 August, 2000



Statement by the Minister for Information & Communications, Ratu Inoke Kubuabol

Those at home and abroad, including political leaders who think that Mahendra Chaudhry and the 1997 Constitution can be brought back by force, are deluding themselves

First of all, it was the army which abrogated the 1997 Constitution on 29 May as it saw it an essential step towards restoring stability and putting in place a much needed new administration to revive the economy.  That cannot be altered.

Second the Fijian people and others too have now made clear that they want neither Chaudhry nor the 1997 Constitution forced down their throats again.

Third, Chaudhry's own deputy Dr Tupeni Baba has publicly  stated in the press that Chaudhry's style of leadership gave offence to Fijians and was a cause of widespread disenchantment with his politics.  And Chaudhry's son and private secretary equally publicly  has made clear that his father's style will not change. Chaudhry is thus no longer acceptable to the people of Fiji.

Fourth, recently Fijian high chief from Tailevu, and Vice President of the Republic publicly said that the coup was not against Indians but against Chaudhry and his government as his arrogant style made Fijians fearful about the security of their own asset, their land

Fifth, the Qaranivalu of Naitasiri, another high chief was quoted in the press over the weekend as saying "If the former Labour Government were more transparent then the coup would not have happened.  Mahendra Chaudhry just spoke transparency he didn't act it"

Sixth, the President of one of the parties allied to him in Government, Ratu Josaia Rayawa was reported on the national radio news as saying that his party wanted a new constitution making Fiji a Christian State and reserving 70% of parliamentary representative for indigenous Fijians.  Obviously his party the VLV/CDA is no longer willing to work with Chaudhry.

Seventh, earlier another of Chaudhry's Fijian allies the Fijian Association Party (FAP) had decided that its relationship with the Fiji Labour Party had ended and that in any case it had never been a genuine or satisfactory partnership.  Thus with the FAP and VLV/CDA having abandoned Chaudhry and his FLP, Chaudhry has no Fijian mandate whatsoever and he cannot be imposed upon the country.

Eighth, disgusted with Chaudhry's critics in India even Indo-Fijians do not want him back.  Here is a sample of what Indians are saying in the press.

In a very short letter Kamal Pal Kumar of Suva wrote as follows in the Fiji Times (25/8): "Since Mahendra Pal Chaudhry has allegiance to India, the interim government should declare Mr Chaudhry persona non grata".

Another Fiji Indian, Praveen Bala writing from Chaudhry's forever constituency in Ba, accuses his government, having destroyed racial relations through "arrogance and dictatorial attitude".  Hence, Praveen Bala concludes, "I want to reiterate to Chaudhry.  Shut up or ship out.  We have had enough of your nonsense".

There is thus no way that the people of Fiji will have Chaudhry, his government and the 1997 Constitution imposed upon them.  They want peace and stability not actions which will reawaken ethnic strife and result yet again in widespread civil disturbance.  Chaudhry is history and so is the 1997 Constitution.  Let them remain so.

Fiji Supplement